Mar
14
Shooting in Low Light(Pub)
Written by
admin
I was shooting at like 1,000 ISO, 1/25 shutter, my biggest aperture for my 18-105mm. No flash. It sucked.
What do you guys do in these condition? Do you just go and use flash? I used flash for some(0 to -3.00) of the shots. What do you guys do when shooting a big long group? The person closest to my flash has their face so bright. LR2 fixed that, but I'm still not satisfied.
I'm probably gonna buy a 50mm soon. I heard that's good for low light conditions.
And yea, direct flash is generally not so hot. A controlled flash (whether its bounced, diffused, or reflected) is much more pleasing.
Another reason why I didn't really use flash. It would annoy others.
I was shooting at like 1,000 ISO, 1/25 shutter, my biggest aperture for my 18-105mm. No flash. It sucked.
What do you guys do in these condition? Do you just go and use flash? I used flash for some(0 to -3.00) of the shots. What do you guys do when shooting a big long group? The person closest to my flash has their face so bright. LR2 fixed that, but I'm still not satisfied.
I'm probably gonna buy a 50mm soon. I heard that's good for low light conditions.
I wouldn't use flash, it's just annoying. You won't get anything usable in pub lighting with a variable aperture kit lens like that. A 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4 would probably be fine. Occasionally, I find it a bit tight, but it's no problem most of the time.
You gear list does not include a flash, there for I'm assuming you don't know how to use one. Now that's just an assumption. I could be totally wrong and you could have invented most flash techniques but you could just abhor them since "it's just annoying".
I also feel that you haven't quite read his post. The section in bold states "a big long group". Wide apertures and high ISO's may be able to make use of crappy ambient, but shooting at f/1.4 will barely have more than the subject's eyes in focus, not to mention anything or anyone else that happens to be in the photo. I think he'd probably be shooting with at least an aperture of f/9 to try and get a group in focus. Maybe even f/11 or narrower. I pretty sure that just using ambient is not an option at that point unles the group is inanimate objects. Then a tripod should be suggested.
This one was shot behind a pub. They have a nice big fenced in public area and my friend who bartends there also wanted to go shooting. I was showing her some of the finer points about how it would be impossible to capture something like this without a flash. This is just one flash and an umbrella too.
Camera:Canon EOS (http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/eos_30d/)
Exposure:0.004 sec (1/250)
Aperture:f/6.3
Focal Length:11 mm
ISO Speed:100
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2074/2424947961_a7139170bd.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/cokronk/2424947961/)
Ed: Oh, and I was using a variable aperture UWA for this.
On camera flash will probably not do what you want from the sounds of it. Even a speed light mounted in the hot shoe will still have problems with light fall off unless you can make the source big enough to cover everything.
http://strobist.blogspot.com/2006/03/lighting-101.html
mmmmm.......... pub.....
The longer you can make the light path the less of a problem light fall off will be. Stand back and zoom in, and bounce the flash off the ceiling a little bit in front of the group.
If you don't have a strobe try this http://www.diyphotography.net/the-party-bouncer-is-back-in-business
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |